A few weeks ago I was doing something uncomfortable.
I was mapping how fundraising actually happens at a child health organisation. Not how it's supposed to happen. How it actually happens.
The difference matters more than you'd think.
Mid-way through the work, the founder asked to see what we had so far. I showed her - rough linear flows, messy swimlanes, half-finished diagrams with questions still unanswered.
She looked at it, then pulled up a document a previous consultant had created. A beautiful fundraising playbook. Neat stages. Clean arrows. Colour-coded steps from first donor outreach all the way to signed contract.
"I want your work to look like that," she said.
I understood the impulse completely.
The playbook looked like competence. It looked like an organisation that had its act together. It looked like the kind of thing you could show a board member and feel proud of.
But here's what the playbook couldn't show:
That donor engagement in this organisation has no real process. Outreach happens when someone remembers to do it.
Follow-ups depend on whoever has bandwidth that week.
Donor scoring — who gets prioritised, who gets a call, who gets a meeting — is based entirely on gut feel and half-remembered conversations.
Nobody had written that down. Because it didn't look good written down.
The playbook didn't fix any of that. It just put a tidy cover over it.
Today's Permission Slip:
You have permission to not have a playbook yet, and to sit with the mess long enough to actually understand it.
This is harder than it sounds because the playbook feels like progress. It's tangible. You can share it. It signals that you're on top of things.
But a playbook built before you understand reality doesn't fix your fundraising. It just makes the dysfunction harder to see. Now you have a document that says the process works - even while donors are slipping through gaps nobody has mapped yet.
And this isn't just a fundraising problem.
I see the same pattern everywhere.
Founders who bring in an HR consultant and get a performance management framework before anyone has mapped why good people keep leaving.
Founders who implement a project management tool before anyone has understood why projects keep missing deadlines.
Founders who write SOPs before anyone has watched how the work actually gets done.
The framework arrives.
Everyone feels productive.
The underlying problem continues now with better documentation on top of it.
The uncomfortable truth is this: you cannot fix a process you don't yet understand and the eagerness to skip straight to the framework is usually a sign of how uncomfortable the reality is.
Looking at the mess - really looking at it - requires admitting that things aren't working.
That the previous consultant's playbook didn't stick.
That the tool you implemented last year didn't solve it.
That the gap between how things are supposed to work and how they actually work is wider than you'd like to believe.
That admission is hard. The playbook is easier.
But the playbook is a map of where you want to go. What you need first is an honest map of where you actually are.
The Practice:
Pick one process in your organisation that feels chaotic despite previous attempts to fix it.
Before you look for a framework, spend one week just watching how it actually happens. Not how it should happen. What actually happens.
Who does what, and why? What triggers action or makes things get forgotten? Where do things quietly fall apart?
Write it down. All of it. Including the parts that don't look good on a diagram.
That messy picture is not the problem. That messy picture is the map. And you cannot fix what you haven't honestly seen.
This Week's Question:
Which process in your organisation has a playbook that looks good on paper but doesn't survive contact with reality?
Here's to leading differently,
Raghav
P.S. The most expensive consultant mistake I see isn't bad advice. It's producing something impressive before the diagnosis is complete. Hit reply if you've been handed a playbook that didn't stick - I'd love to hear what happened.
P.P.S. Know a leader who could do with hearing this? Forward this to them. They can subscribe here.